i haven't said enough...
Tuesday, September 27, 2005
  henri and stieglitz
Robert Henri and Alfred Stieglitz are two of the most influential artists since the beginning of the 20th century. One realist painter, and one pioneering photographer, these two individuals have paved the way to the success of American art.

Both are great adversaries - admittedly or not - of the Academy and the ideology of the Gilded Age. Henri saw himself as the rescuer of American art from the controlling assessment of American culture and society of the Academy, while Stieglitz was appalled of the Gilded Age's materialism and "cultural complacency". Both also surpassed their roles as great teachers: Henri being a man of great magnetism and arguably the greatest single influence in American art; and Stieglitz on the other hand was even called by Marcel Duchamp a great man with great judgment and primarily a humanist.

Generally, both have a similar goal: the betterment of American art. But the specifics of the hows and the whys are not quite the same.

Henri was a believer of the power of mass media, which is not limited to magazines and newspaper, and that such is a necessity for an American artist in the modern art world. It is of no surprise that the Armory Show he led in February and March of 1913 in New York was an astonishing success. Stieglitz in fact did a one-man show of his prints in his gallery to see how it would measure up against a highly-publicized show. The pioneering photographer found it distressing that many attend such commercially-inclined exhibitions and having paintings and other works of art as material commodities and not as spiritual forces. It is to note that wife Georgia O'Keeffe once said that Stieglitz works were "aesthetically, spiritually significant." Not to say that The Eight's works were shallow, but Stieglitz' works attempted to capture the poetic meaning of urban life, as compared to the Ashcan artists' seemingly careless brushstrokes.

Henri believed that the integration of American art to American society is by placing the reality of the society in the artworks, and by exposing these works to all. Stieglitz felt the same but such integration should be an individual choice. What Henri was trying to achieve socially, Stieglitz was trying the same spiritually. As we can see in today's situation, both are arguably successful.
 
Comments:
e2 ang research proj mo art history noh? :)
 
do i look like i care? :D
 
Refreshing to see someone discuss photography without mentioning equipment or techniqe.
 
well, thanks! but to be honest, i know nil about photography :lol:
 
All the better!

:)
 
Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home
my personal, emotional, intellectual, political, sexual, social, spiritual, scholarly, and childish rantings about anything conceivable by the human mind and felt by the human heart and soul.

about me
i'm in MySpace and Friendster.

F Ken Maes's Facebook 

profile

View F Ken Maes's 

profile on LinkedIn
Archives
February 2004 / March 2004 / April 2004 / May 2004 / June 2004 / July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / January 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / April 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / July 2010 /


Powered by Blogger